From Features to Fairness: A Thematic Review of Optimized Machine Learning for Student Placement
Abstract
Machine learning (ML) is increasingly deployed in academic placement and student transition prediction, yet adoption remains constrained by persistent challenges: high-dimensional and redundant feature spaces, opaque model behaviour, and the frequent absence of disciplined baseline-versus-optimized comparisons. This review synthesizes theoretical foundations and empirical evidence across ML-based educational prediction, with focused attention on feature selection strategies, explainable artificial intelligence (XAI), and the inherent trade-off between predictive accuracy and interpretability. The paper further identifies critical open challenges, including limited dataset generalizability, class imbalance, algorithmic fairness, and the absence of standardized evaluation frameworks, and concludes by proposing actionable directions for future inquiry.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmed, R., & Khan, S. (2023). A hybrid feature selection model combining filter and wrapper techniques for educational data classification. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 15(2), 45–62.
Ahmed, T., Bello, A., & Yusuf, K. (2024). Combining genetic algorithms with recursive feature elimination for educational dataset optimisation. International Journal of Machine Learning Applications, 9(1), 22–38.
Al Braiki, B., Rustamov, Z., Rustamov, J., & Zaki, N. (2021). Enhancing predictive performance in identifying at-risk students: Integration of topological features and node embeddings in machine learning models.
Al Husaini, Y., Syufiza, N., Shukor, A., Said, Y. N., & Husaini, A. (2022). Factors affecting students' academic performance: A review (Vol. 12). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/367360842
Albreiki, B., Zaki, N., & Alashwal, H. (2021). A systematic literature review of student performance prediction using machine learning techniques. Education Sciences, 11(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci11090552
Almeida, F., & Costa, R. (2023). Comparing logistic regression with ensemble methods in placement predictions. Journal of Applied Educational Analytics, 7(3), 112–128.
Beckham, N. R., Akeh, L. J., Mitaart, G. N. P., & Moniaga, J. V. (2022). Determining factors that affect student performance using various machine learning methods. Procedia Computer Science, 216, 597–603. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.12.174
Bergstra, J., & Bengio, Y. (2012). Random search for hyper-parameter optimization. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 13, 281–305.
Brown, S., Ahmed, L., & Wei, T. (2025). A comparative study of machine learning models in education. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 53(1), 61–79.
Bujang, S. D. A., Selamat, A., Ibrahim, R., Krejcar, O., Herrera-Viedma, E., Fujita, H., & Ghani, N. A. M. (2021). Multiclass prediction model for student grade prediction using machine learning. IEEE Access, 9, 95608–95621. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3093563
Çetinkaya, A., Baykan, Ö. K., & Kırgız, H. (2023). Analysis of machine learning classification approaches for predicting students' programming aptitude. Sustainability (Switzerland), 15(17). https://doi.org/10.3390/su151712917
Chandrashekar, G., & Sahin, F. (2014). A survey on feature selection methods. Computers & Electrical Engineering, 40, 16–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compeleceng.2013.11.024
Chen, Y., Li, M., & Zhao, Q. (2024). Recursive feature elimination combined with SHAP explanations for educational prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 238, 121–134.
Davis, K., Mensah, P., & Okoro, J. (2025). A comparative framework evaluating baseline and optimised machine learning models in education. Journal of Learning Analytics, 12(1), 88–104.
Farhood, H., Joudah, I., Beheshti, A., & Muller, S. (2024). Evaluating and enhancing artificial intelligence models for predicting student learning outcomes. Informatics, 11(3), 46. https://doi.org/10.3390/informatics11030046
García, M., López, R., & Fernández, A. (2024). Explainable AI methods in learning analytics systems. Computers & Education: Artificial Intelligence, 6, 100–112.
Ghorbani, R., & Ghousi, R. (2020). Comparing different resampling methods in predicting students' performance using machine learning techniques. IEEE Access, 8, 67899–67911. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2020.2986809
Gupta, V., Singhal, P., & Khattri, V. (2024). Analysis of student academic performance using machine learning algorithms: A study. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10851854
Hashim, A. S., Awadh, W. A., & Hamoud, A. K. (2020). Student performance prediction model based on supervised machine learning algorithms. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 928(3). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/928/3/032019
Holmes, W., & Tuomi, I. (2022). State of the art and practice in AI in education. European Journal of Education, 57, 542–570. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12533
Ibrahim, A., & Yusuf, K. (2025). Applying fairness metrics to student placement models. Journal of Fair and Ethical AI, 3(1), 15–29.
Idris, R., Govindasamy, P., Nachiappan, S., & Bacotang, J. (2023). Exploring the impact of cognitive factors on learning, motivation and career in Malaysia's STEM education. International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences, 13(6). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v13-i6/17227
Kumar, R., & Patel, S. (2024). Fairness-aware machine learning techniques in student selection systems. Journal of Educational AI Ethics, 2(2), 55–70.
Li, X., Wang, H., & Zhang, F. (2023). Student performance prediction using Random Forest and Support Vector Machines. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 61(4), 789–806.
Mehrabi, N., Morstatter, F., Saxena, N., Lerman, K., & Galstyan, A. (2021). A survey on bias and fairness in machine learning. ACM Computing Surveys, 54, 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1145/3457607
Molnar, C. (2022). Interpretable machine learning: A guide for making black box models explainable (Self-published). https://christophm.github.io/interpretable-ml-book/
Mustapha, R., Uju, A. S., Haruna, K., Lawal, I. A., Abubakar, R., & Jibril, A. U. (2023). Placement model for students into appropriate academic class using machine learning. Journal of Science & Technology, 7(1), 170–183. https://doi.org/10.56471/slujst.v7i
Nakamura, T., Sato, K., & Yamamoto, R. (2024). Integrating SHAP explanations into a gradient boosting model for university admissions prediction. Journal of AI in Higher Education, 4(1), 33–47.
Ofori, F., Maina, E., Gitonga, R., & Elizaphan Maina, D. (2024). Using machine learning algorithms to predict students' performance and improve learning outcome: A literature-based review. Stratford Peer Reviewed Journals and Book Publishing Journal of Information and Technology, 4, 2616–3573.
Ojo, T., & Mensah, K. (2025). The role of data preprocessing in improving academic prediction models. African Journal of Educational Technology, 6(1), 41–56.
Okafor, C., & Adeyemi, B. (2025). A neural network-based system for academic track allocation in tertiary institutions. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 37(1), 101–119.
Olabanjo, O., & Wusu, A. (2022). A machine learning prediction of academic performance of secondary school students using radial basis function neural network. https://doi.org/10.20944/preprints202207.0088.v1
Oliveira, T., Costa, M., & Ferreira, P. (2023). The impact of correlated features on educational predictions. Journal of Data Science in Education, 5(2), 77–91.
Probst, P., Boulesteix, A.-L., & Bischl, B. (2019). Tunability: Importance of hyperparameters of machine learning algorithms. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 20, 1934–1965.
Rahman, M., Islam, S., & Chowdhury, N. (2024). Comparing filter-based and wrapper-based feature selection methods in academic datasets. Journal of Educational Informatics, 8(2), 60–75.
Rudin, C. (2019). Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead. Nature Machine Intelligence, 1, 206–215. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42256-019-0048-x
Singh, A., & Verma, R. (2024). Application of gradient boosting algorithms for student placement prediction. Journal of Machine Learning in Education, 3(1), 18–32.
Smith, J., & Taylor, L. (2025). Evaluating interpretable boosting machines in academic classification tasks. Journal of Explainable AI Applications, 2(1), 5–19.
Thomas, R., & Clark, D. (2023). Overfitting challenges in educational datasets. Educational Data Science Review, 4(2), 91–105.
Wang, L., Chen, X., & Liu, Y. (2024). Model compression techniques to simplify complex predictive systems. Journal of Applied Machine Learning, 6(1), 24–39.
Yağcı, M. (2022). Educational data mining: Prediction of students' academic performance using machine learning algorithms. Smart Learning Environments, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-022-00192-z
Zawacki-Richter, O., Marín, V. I., Bond, M., & Gouverneur, F. (2022). Systematic review of research on artificial intelligence applications in higher education – Where are the educators? International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 19(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-021-00249-8
Zhou, H., Fang, J., & Xu, K. (2024). Dimensionality reduction techniques in educational datasets: PCA and recursive feature elimination. Journal of Learning Analytics and Data Science, 5(1), 29–46.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.